logo

What strategy is: the answer to limited resources and competition

Everyone knows the word, yet hardly two people in the same room mean the same thing by it. Here's a definition that holds up in daily practice, and the test most strategies fail.

By Christian Underwood ·

Loose tiles are scattered around an open frame; a single tile sits inside it, highlighted.
Contents (7 sections)
  1. What is strategy?
  2. Why does a company need a strategy at all?
  3. What separates strategy from planning and tactics?
  4. Which five questions does a strategy answer?
  5. How do you know you don't have a strategy?
  6. What isn't a strategy?
  7. Frequently asked questions about the term strategy

What is strategy?

Strategy answers two questions that come up in every company as soon as it outgrows the kitchen table: where do we put our limited resources, and how does that set us apart from everyone who wants the same thing? Everything else attached to the word is decoration.

The word comes from the military. In ancient Greek, the "strategos" was the commander of an army. He sets the direction, determines where the troops stand and which battle is fought when. How the fighting then happens is tactics. That distinction outlives every management fad to this day.

A strategy is a bet. You commit to a future nobody knows and tie money and people to it. Anyone who uses the word without risking anything means something else.

That also explains why the term carries so much baggage. It holds both the idea of sober, deliberate action and the idea of getting ahead by outsmarting others. Both meanings sit in the same meeting room the moment the word comes up, which is why every serious piece of strategy work starts with everyone in the room agreeing on what it means.

Why does a company need a strategy at all?

The first reason is obvious and still rarely said out loud: your resources are limited. More money in one business area means less in another. Making that trade-off is the job of senior leadership, and it can't be delegated downward.

The second reason is competition. No company operates in a vacuum, and even a strong position is vulnerable. Here's what that looks like in a mid-sized company: a custom machinery builder has held the largest share of its niche for twenty years. A competitor sells the same machine with remote maintenance and spare-parts forecasting. After that, the customer isn't buying a machine anymore, they're buying uptime. Two years later the share has been cut in half, without a single price being undercut.

The example shows what matters: you don't become vulnerable where you get worse. You become vulnerable where the customer's question changes.

The most common objection is that in a world full of disruption nothing can be planned anyway, so agility and fast reaction are enough. Henry Mintzberg showed back in 1994 that the order runs the other way. A plan operationalizes a strategy that has to exist first. If you extend last year's numbers every fall and call that strategy, you don't have one.

What separates strategy from planning and tactics?

Willie Pietersen, who teaches at Columbia Business School, uses an image that settles the question: first the tracks have to be laid, then the trains can run on time. The route is the strategy. The timetable is tactics.

The difference isn't altitude, it's commitment. You can change a departure time on Monday. A rail line sits where it sits, and moving it costs a multiple of what laying it cost. That's exactly why strategic decisions are uncomfortable: they can't be quietly corrected.

Strategy

Tactics

Question

Where do we put our resources, and what do we stand for?

How do we win this deal, this week?

Time horizon

three to five years

days to months

Commitment

high, reversing costs more than getting there

low, corrections are possible at any time

Who decides

senior leadership, together and documented

whoever owns the day-to-day work

This distinction has a practical consequence that often gets overlooked. Because a strategic decision is expensive to reverse, the assumption behind it is part of the decision. Write it down when you decide. Otherwise, a year later there's no way to check whether the decision was wrong or whether the world changed, and you end up discussing people instead of facts.

In soccer, the difference is immediately clear. The playing philosophy is strategy: high possession or fast transitions, an attacking or a defensive setup. The rehearsed corner kick is tactics. No coach confuses the two, and in companies it happens every week.

Which five questions does a strategy answer?

Anyone with a strategy can answer these five questions without asking back. If you stall on one of them, you know what to work on next.

#

Question

What it's about

1

What do we want to achieve?

The core financial goal. The return on the capital you deploy has to exceed the cost of that capital. Otherwise, everything else is just activity.

2

Who decides and who executes?

Direction, goals and priorities sit with the leadership of the company. That includes providing the resources and tracking execution.

3

Why these goals, and for whom?

The purpose of the company and a perspective that holds up. Without an answer to that, every number is interchangeable.

4

Where and when do we deploy our resources?

The choice of playing fields and the timing. The environment keeps shifting, so this answer belongs on the table regularly.

5

How do we deploy them?

Your positioning in the markets and the instruments you use to get there. This is where marketing, sales, HR and development connect.

Together, the answers define how you deploy capital and people against the competition. The weight sits on the fifth question, because that is where you decide what tells a customer you are not interchangeable.

How do you know you don't have a strategy?

There is a test that takes three minutes. Hand everyone on the leadership team a sheet of paper and ask them to write down the company's strategy. Then read the answers out loud. In most rooms, you get silence first, then a collection of value levers, growth fields and customer focus in which no two texts match.

The most common defense that follows is market share. It has a catch: a share number says nothing until you also say where the market ends. Define the pond narrowly enough and you're at a hundred percent. The number also doesn't answer why you're ahead and how you got there.

If the test goes badly, that's no reason for bad moods in the leadership team. It only shows that the strategy has lived in people's heads so far, not in words. So the next step isn't another analysis. It's a joint session where five texts become one.

The tougher test is a question. If your company no longer existed tomorrow, would anyone miss it? You don't answer that question yourself. Your customers do. Anyone who can be replaced within a few weeks has utilization, not a strategy.

What isn't a strategy?

Three things regularly carry the name without earning it.

  • The budget round. Forecast and planning rounds are about fighting for resources and moving numbers around. What comes out at the end is a number for next year. A direction doesn't.
  • The offsite in a nice location. Two days at a monastery or a conference hotel produce material and good energy. Without a process before and after, what's left is a photo record.
  • Agility as a substitute. Reacting quickly to change is a capability, not a direction. If all you do is react, you leave the choice of playing field to others.

A strategy becomes visible through something else: a decision against something. Michael Porter put it in its shortest form in the Harvard Business Review in 1996. The essence of strategy is choosing what not to do. A strategy paper without a single deletion describes intentions.

That's also where the resemblance to planning ends. A plan may contain everything that's likely. A strategy contains what you've decided on, and names the rest as what you're leaving out.

Frequently asked questions about the term strategy

What is a strategy, simply explained?

The decision about what you deploy your limited resources for, and what sets you apart from competitors as a result. That always includes a decision against something: what you deliberately leave out is as much part of the strategy as what you take on.

What's the difference between strategy and tactics?

Commitment. You can change a tactical move quickly and cheaply, an offer or a channel, for example. A strategic decision commits you for years, and reversing it costs more than getting there did.

Is strategy the same as planning?

No. Planning answers how much you want to sell next year, and it can be extrapolated from the past. Strategy answers with what, to whom and why you of all companies. It comes before planning, not after.

Does a mid-sized company need a strategy?

Especially then. The more limited your resources, the more expensive any initiative that just runs alongside everything else. A large corporation can absorb three bad bets at once. A company with 120 employees can absorb them one at a time.

How long does a strategy hold?

Three to five years is a realistic range. Individual parts age faster, product strategy under competitive pressure, for example. That's why you review annually whether the assumptions your strategy rests on still hold.

Related

More articles